205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.68%
Negative revenue growth while NXPI stands at 3.21%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
9.32%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x NXPI's 0.13%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
43.39%
Positive EBIT growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
33.50%
Positive operating income growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
15.24%
Positive net income growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
20.00%
Positive EPS growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
20.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
45.37%
Slight or no buybacks while NXPI is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
42.90%
Slight or no buyback while NXPI is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-33.23%
Dividend reduction while NXPI stands at 0.12%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-24.69%
Negative OCF growth while NXPI is at 37.88%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-19.83%
Negative FCF growth while NXPI is at 94.26%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-33.03%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while NXPI stands at 79.10%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-57.43%
Negative 5Y CAGR while NXPI stands at 77.31%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-63.08%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.86%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while NXPI is at 107.18%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-46.80%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
12.76%
Below 50% of NXPI's 36.73%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-27.94%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while NXPI is 328.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-56.65%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
115.41%
Below 50% of NXPI's 1254.96%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
42.97%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 18.89%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
6.40%
Below 50% of NXPI's 42.98%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
29.25%
Dividend/share CAGR of 29.25% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
-1.57%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while NXPI stands at 169.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-33.25%
Negative near-term dividend growth while NXPI invests at 20.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-2.35%
Firm’s AR is declining while NXPI shows 1.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
8.42%
Inventory growth well above NXPI's 0.47%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
6.96%
Asset growth above 1.5x NXPI's 0.28%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-25.51%
We have a declining book value while NXPI shows 3.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-1.07%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-3.44%
Our R&D shrinks while NXPI invests at 4.75%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
5.47%
We expand SG&A while NXPI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.