205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-16.40%
Negative revenue growth while NXPI stands at 3.21%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-29.55%
Negative gross profit growth while NXPI is at 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-62.46%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-62.46%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-63.67%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-65.79%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-64.86%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
2.06%
Slight or no buybacks while NXPI is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-12.19%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-2.02%
Dividend reduction while NXPI stands at 0.12%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-81.83%
Negative OCF growth while NXPI is at 37.88%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-145.60%
Negative FCF growth while NXPI is at 94.26%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
9.31%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 79.10%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-19.03%
Negative 5Y CAGR while NXPI stands at 77.31%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
1.93%
Positive 3Y CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
72.96%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of NXPI's 104.58%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
241.61%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 107.18%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
333.18%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
403.33%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 36.73% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
20.89%
Below 50% of NXPI's 328.95%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
1743.73%
Positive short-term CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
305.24%
Below 50% of NXPI's 1254.96%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
163.29%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 18.89%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
91.82%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 42.98%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
5.40%
Dividend/share CAGR of 5.40% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
-0.94%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while NXPI stands at 169.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-1.13%
Negative near-term dividend growth while NXPI invests at 20.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-11.62%
Firm’s AR is declining while NXPI shows 1.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-4.30%
Inventory is declining while NXPI stands at 0.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-2.70%
Negative asset growth while NXPI invests at 0.28%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.20%
Under 50% of NXPI's 3.20%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-6.60%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
1.13%
R&D dropping or stable vs. NXPI's 4.75%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-13.22%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.