205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.24%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of NXPI's 3.21%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
47.23%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x NXPI's 0.13%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
83.58%
Positive EBIT growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
83.58%
Positive operating income growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
67.24%
Positive net income growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
72.41%
Positive EPS growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
72.41%
Positive diluted EPS growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
18.75%
Slight or no buybacks while NXPI is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
18.75%
Slight or no buyback while NXPI is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-13.45%
Dividend reduction while NXPI stands at 0.12%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-62.05%
Negative OCF growth while NXPI is at 37.88%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-67.65%
Negative FCF growth while NXPI is at 94.26%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-45.13%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while NXPI stands at 79.10%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-35.18%
Negative 5Y CAGR while NXPI stands at 77.31%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-24.61%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
1782.46%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 104.58%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-18.33%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while NXPI is at 107.18%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
14.77%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-148.33%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while NXPI is at 36.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-123.65%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while NXPI is 328.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-112.54%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
216.59%
Below 50% of NXPI's 1254.96%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
124.69%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 18.89%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
49.26%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x NXPI's 42.98%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
-27.60%
Cut dividends over 10 years while NXPI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-7.16%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while NXPI stands at 169.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-5.66%
Negative near-term dividend growth while NXPI invests at 20.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
4.26%
AR growth well above NXPI's 1.04%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
2.26%
Inventory growth well above NXPI's 0.47%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-1.53%
Negative asset growth while NXPI invests at 0.28%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-16.01%
We have a declining book value while NXPI shows 3.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
0.24%
We have some new debt while NXPI reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
1.57%
R&D dropping or stable vs. NXPI's 4.75%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-11.96%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.