205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.14%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of NXPI's 3.21%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
12.09%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x NXPI's 0.13%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
128.36%
Positive EBIT growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
128.36%
Positive operating income growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
119.86%
Positive net income growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
119.44%
Positive EPS growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
119.44%
Positive diluted EPS growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
2.54%
Slight or no buybacks while NXPI is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
2.54%
Slight or no buyback while NXPI is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
0.23%
Dividend growth above 1.5x NXPI's 0.12%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
-73.66%
Negative OCF growth while NXPI is at 37.88%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-87.40%
Negative FCF growth while NXPI is at 94.26%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
1.63%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 79.10%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-6.45%
Negative 5Y CAGR while NXPI stands at 77.31%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-22.48%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
64.62%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of NXPI's 104.58%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
506.54%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 107.18%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-52.39%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
26.17%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of NXPI's 36.73%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
892.78%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 328.95%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-72.86%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
363.72%
Below 50% of NXPI's 1254.96%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
67.55%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 18.89%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-6.45%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while NXPI is at 42.98%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
46.91%
Dividend/share CAGR of 46.91% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
4.65%
Below 50% of NXPI's 169.49%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
3.23%
Below 50% of NXPI's 20.43%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
12.16%
AR growth well above NXPI's 1.04%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
11.65%
Inventory growth well above NXPI's 0.47%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-1.93%
Negative asset growth while NXPI invests at 0.28%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-2.52%
We have a declining book value while NXPI shows 3.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-20.32%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-0.97%
Our R&D shrinks while NXPI invests at 4.75%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
4.51%
We expand SG&A while NXPI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.