205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.71%
Revenue growth above 1.5x NXPI's 3.21%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
1.74%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x NXPI's 0.13%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-18.30%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-18.30%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
3.42%
Positive net income growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.42%
Slight or no buybacks while NXPI is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
3.42%
Slight or no buyback while NXPI is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-3.31%
Dividend reduction while NXPI stands at 0.12%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
92.86%
OCF growth above 1.5x NXPI's 37.88%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
237.50%
FCF growth above 1.5x NXPI's 94.26%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-16.43%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while NXPI stands at 79.10%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-2.34%
Negative 5Y CAGR while NXPI stands at 77.31%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-18.48%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
23.60%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 104.58%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
10.68%
Below 50% of NXPI's 107.18%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-41.48%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-18.75%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while NXPI is at 36.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
110.54%
Below 50% of NXPI's 328.95%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-90.75%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
285.08%
Below 50% of NXPI's 1254.96%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
66.14%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 18.89%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-14.43%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while NXPI is at 42.98%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
15.94%
Dividend/share CAGR of 15.94% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
1.45%
Below 50% of NXPI's 169.49%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
7.83%
Below 50% of NXPI's 20.43%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
5.49%
AR growth well above NXPI's 1.04%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
13.38%
Inventory growth well above NXPI's 0.47%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
1.66%
Asset growth above 1.5x NXPI's 0.28%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-1.39%
We have a declining book value while NXPI shows 3.20%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-12.30%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
3.92%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. NXPI's 4.75%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
8.97%
We expand SG&A while NXPI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.