PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.39%
Revenue growth above 1.5x NXPI's 3.21%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
12.03%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x NXPI's 0.13%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
24.89%
Positive EBIT growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
24.89%
Positive operating income growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
20.16%
Positive net income growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
19.05%
Positive EPS growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
19.05%
Positive diluted EPS growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
1.79%
Slight or no buybacks while NXPI is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-1.12%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-1.76%
Dividend reduction while NXPI stands at 0.12%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
28.75%
OCF growth at 75-90% of NXPI's 37.88%. Bill Ackman would demand better working capital management or cost discipline.
1975.00%
FCF growth above 1.5x NXPI's 94.26%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
7.68%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 79.10%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
22.96%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 77.31%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
61.53%
Positive 3Y CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
45.01%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 104.58%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
48.79%
Below 50% of NXPI's 107.18%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-12.33%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
99.88%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 36.73% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
21.43%
Below 50% of NXPI's 328.95%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
327.27%
Positive short-term CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
287.62%
Below 50% of NXPI's 1254.96%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
68.15%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 18.89%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-0.31%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while NXPI is at 42.98%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
81.51%
Dividend/share CAGR of 81.51% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
-1.12%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while NXPI stands at 169.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
1.53%
Below 50% of NXPI's 20.43%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
15.02%
AR growth well above NXPI's 1.04%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
11.93%
Inventory growth well above NXPI's 0.47%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
1.68%
Asset growth above 1.5x NXPI's 0.28%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.11%
Under 50% of NXPI's 3.20%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-4.70%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
4.05%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. NXPI's 4.75%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
5.93%
We expand SG&A while NXPI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.