PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.08%
Revenue growth above 1.5x NXPI's 3.09%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
12.14%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x NXPI's 10.28%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
15.73%
EBIT growth below 50% of NXPI's 141.89%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
16.53%
Operating income growth under 50% of NXPI's 141.89%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
16.87%
Positive net income growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
18.87%
Positive EPS growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
19.23%
Positive diluted EPS growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-2.03%
Share reduction while NXPI is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-2.01%
Reduced diluted shares while NXPI is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.70%
Dividend growth of 0.70% while NXPI is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-20.85%
Negative OCF growth while NXPI is at 640.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-43.18%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
74.35%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 33.00%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
45.91%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x NXPI's 33.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
21.46%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of NXPI's 33.00%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
24.50%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 123.21%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-8.14%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while NXPI is at 123.21%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-25.55%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while NXPI stands at 123.21%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-15.87%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
65.53%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
49.96%
Positive short-term CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
9.16%
Equity/share CAGR of 9.16% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
15.04%
Equity/share CAGR of 15.04% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
0.96%
Equity/share CAGR of 0.96% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
513.01%
Dividend/share CAGR of 513.01% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
384.68%
Dividend/share CAGR of 384.68% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
52.06%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 52.06% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
12.39%
Our AR growth while NXPI is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
5.72%
We show growth while NXPI is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-1.67%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
1.55%
Positive BV/share change while NXPI is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.95%
We increase R&D while NXPI cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
5.29%
We expand SG&A while NXPI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.