PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.98%
Revenue growth above 1.5x NXPI's 1.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
7.66%
Gross profit growth similar to NXPI's 7.42%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
11.16%
EBIT growth below 50% of NXPI's 39.78%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
10.84%
Operating income growth under 50% of NXPI's 39.78%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
11.70%
Net income growth under 50% of NXPI's 201.93%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
12.70%
EPS growth under 50% of NXPI's 192.86%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
14.52%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of NXPI's 192.26%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-1.99%
Share reduction while NXPI is at 10.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-2.05%
Reduced diluted shares while NXPI is at 10.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.75%
Dividend reduction while NXPI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
134.52%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x NXPI's 95.06%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
230.47%
FCF growth 75-90% of NXPI's 285.11%. Bill Ackman might push for improved capital allocation or operational changes to match the competitor.
72.02%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 2.17%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
42.89%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 2.17%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
22.19%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 2.17%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
292.55%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of NXPI's 381.03%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
19.41%
Below 50% of NXPI's 381.03%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
3.03%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 381.03%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
83.88%
Positive 10Y CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
86.72%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
32.48%
Positive short-term CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
16.38%
Equity/share CAGR of 16.38% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
15.09%
Equity/share CAGR of 15.09% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
7.05%
Equity/share CAGR of 7.05% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
493.84%
Dividend/share CAGR of 493.84% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
784467.57%
Dividend/share CAGR of 784467.57% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
50.12%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 50.12% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
2.27%
Our AR growth while NXPI is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
5.56%
Inventory growth well above NXPI's 7.23%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
3.99%
Asset growth at 75-90% of NXPI's 5.09%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
4.19%
Under 50% of NXPI's 115.23%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.38%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. NXPI's 8.76%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
3.44%
We expand SG&A while NXPI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.