205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.95%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of NXPI's 3.60%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
1.45%
Gross profit growth under 50% of NXPI's 3.36%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-0.33%
Negative EBIT growth while NXPI is at 23.15%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-0.33%
Negative operating income growth while NXPI is at 23.15%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
0.90%
Positive net income growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
1.79%
Positive EPS growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
1.82%
Positive diluted EPS growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.94%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.17%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-1.03%
Dividend reduction while NXPI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
22.29%
OCF growth at 50-75% of NXPI's 38.46%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
10.25%
Positive FCF growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
163.00%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 6.91%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
25.66%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 6.91%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
17.83%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 6.91%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
66.82%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of NXPI's 104.44%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
32.66%
Below 50% of NXPI's 104.44%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
38.83%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 104.44%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
628.47%
Positive 10Y CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-62.18%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
30.50%
Positive short-term CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
33.35%
Equity/share CAGR of 33.35% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
14.54%
Equity/share CAGR of 14.54% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
24.70%
Equity/share CAGR of 24.70% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
528.07%
Dividend/share CAGR of 528.07% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
328.75%
Dividend/share CAGR of 328.75% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
29.76%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 29.76% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
6.63%
AR growth well above NXPI's 1.51%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
5.01%
Inventory growth well above NXPI's 6.33%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
28.46%
Asset growth above 1.5x NXPI's 0.58%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.09%
BV/share growth above 1.5x NXPI's 2.65%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.47%
R&D dropping or stable vs. NXPI's 7.14%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
3.79%
We expand SG&A while NXPI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.