PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.23%
Positive revenue growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-0.51%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-13.11%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-10.06%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-10.57%
Negative net income growth while NXPI stands at 258.33%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-8.77%
Negative EPS growth while NXPI is at 255.88%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-8.93%
Negative diluted EPS growth while NXPI is at 266.67%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-1.04%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.95%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.30%
Dividend reduction while NXPI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
80.35%
OCF growth under 50% of NXPI's 1000.00%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
166.20%
FCF growth under 50% of NXPI's 376.36%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
173.88%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
21.32%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
16.64%
Positive 3Y CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
397.80%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with NXPI's 436.54%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
257.54%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of NXPI's 436.54%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
23.30%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 436.54%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
850.50%
Positive 10Y CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
12.70%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
21.68%
Positive short-term CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
39.50%
Equity/share CAGR of 39.50% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
20.69%
Equity/share CAGR of 20.69% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
24.51%
Equity/share CAGR of 24.51% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
484.42%
Dividend/share CAGR of 484.42% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
323.55%
Dividend/share CAGR of 323.55% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
28.78%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 28.78% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
6.70%
Our AR growth while NXPI is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
11.52%
Inventory growth well above NXPI's 6.83%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
22.28%
Positive asset growth while NXPI is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.19%
Under 50% of NXPI's 11.29%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
65.84%
We have some new debt while NXPI reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-6.84%
Our R&D shrinks while NXPI invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-5.60%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.