PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.65%
Revenue growth under 50% of NXPI's 6.95%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
5.39%
Positive gross profit growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
44.97%
EBIT growth above 1.5x NXPI's 7.69%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
40.47%
Operating income growth above 1.5x NXPI's 7.69%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
75.78%
Net income growth under 50% of NXPI's 227.78%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
78.95%
EPS growth under 50% of NXPI's 227.78%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
76.32%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of NXPI's 225.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.88%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.13%
Reduced diluted shares while NXPI is at 1.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.37%
Dividend growth of 0.37% while NXPI is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
78.07%
Positive OCF growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
98.87%
Positive FCF growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
128.08%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
16.05%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
30.73%
Positive 3Y CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
221.77%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of NXPI's 427.42%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
-1.55%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while NXPI is at 427.42%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
60.07%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 427.42%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
530.73%
Positive 10Y CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
26.69%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
61.84%
Positive short-term CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
55.49%
Equity/share CAGR of 55.49% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
28.39%
Equity/share CAGR of 28.39% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
34.19%
Equity/share CAGR of 34.19% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
707.91%
Dividend/share CAGR of 707.91% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
113.40%
Dividend/share CAGR of 113.40% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
56.13%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 56.13% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-0.37%
Firm’s AR is declining while NXPI shows 3.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-1.96%
Inventory is declining while NXPI stands at 4.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
5.09%
Positive asset growth while NXPI is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.10%
Under 50% of NXPI's 15.73%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
20.99%
We have some new debt while NXPI reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-3.54%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-0.66%
We cut SG&A while NXPI invests at 2.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.