PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.35%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of NXPI's 12.31%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
8.67%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of NXPI's 11.76%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
19.59%
EBIT growth 75-90% of NXPI's 23.29%. Bill Ackman would push for cost reforms or better product mix to narrow the gap.
19.65%
Operating income growth at 75-90% of NXPI's 23.29%. Bill Ackman would demand a plan to enhance operating leverage.
20.94%
Positive net income growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
22.22%
Positive EPS growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
22.58%
Positive diluted EPS growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-1.03%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.10%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.21%
Dividend reduction while NXPI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
78.45%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x NXPI's 64.05%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
84.17%
FCF growth 50-75% of NXPI's 113.19%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
75.81%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 28.80%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
43.93%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 28.80%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
9.01%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 50.96%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
139.61%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 812.73%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
96.33%
Below 50% of NXPI's 812.73%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
31.16%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 111.78%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
139.45%
Positive 10Y CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
81.78%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
48.33%
Positive short-term CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
32.52%
Equity/share CAGR of 32.52% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
31.35%
Equity/share CAGR of 31.35% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
2.49%
Positive short-term equity growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
1346.20%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1346.20% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
173.68%
Dividend/share CAGR of 173.68% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
132.62%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 132.62% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-3.27%
Firm’s AR is declining while NXPI shows 8.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
0.40%
We show growth while NXPI is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
0.51%
Positive asset growth while NXPI is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.09%
Positive BV/share change while NXPI is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-0.06%
We’re deleveraging while NXPI stands at 6.37%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-4.87%
Our R&D shrinks while NXPI invests at 8.89%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-1.91%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.