PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.64%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-4.17%
Negative gross profit growth while NXPI is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-13.26%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-12.91%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-20.48%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-19.48%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-19.74%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.21%
Share reduction while NXPI is at 0.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.19%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.21%
Dividend growth of 0.21% while NXPI is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-52.12%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-57.63%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
72.62%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of NXPI's 93.38%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
16.03%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to NXPI's 16.53%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
10.46%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 59.91%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
89.65%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 192.54%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
1.26%
Below 50% of NXPI's 2370.27%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
48.44%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 304.45%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
159.95%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 82.90% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
17.70%
Below 50% of NXPI's 71.30%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
170.91%
Positive short-term CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
41.87%
Equity/share CAGR of 41.87% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
24.85%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
2.50%
Positive short-term equity growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
1248.38%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1248.38% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
182.07%
Dividend/share CAGR of 182.07% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
99.80%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 99.80% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
11.88%
Our AR growth while NXPI is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
3.36%
Inventory growth well above NXPI's 2.25%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-2.12%
Negative asset growth while NXPI invests at 2.50%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.01%
Positive BV/share change while NXPI is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-0.09%
We’re deleveraging while NXPI stands at 1.13%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
8.68%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. NXPI's 0.51%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
2.33%
SG&A declining or stable vs. NXPI's 6.06%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.