PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.60%
Revenue growth similar to NXPI's 2.66%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
3.58%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x NXPI's 2.84%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
5.30%
EBIT growth below 50% of NXPI's 12.54%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
5.43%
Operating income growth under 50% of NXPI's 12.54%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
6.10%
Net income growth under 50% of NXPI's 380.37%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
6.45%
EPS growth under 50% of NXPI's 380.43%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
6.56%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of NXPI's 367.39%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.99%
Share reduction while NXPI is at 0.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.94%
Reduced diluted shares while NXPI is at 4.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.43%
Dividend growth of 0.43% while NXPI is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
34.65%
Positive OCF growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
43.00%
Positive FCF growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
57.57%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to NXPI's 54.28%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
7.99%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 16.00%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
6.84%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 46.88%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
56.58%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 193.04%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
70.44%
Below 50% of NXPI's 300.87%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
33.92%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of NXPI's 39.23%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
75.01%
Positive 10Y CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
5.73%
Below 50% of NXPI's 176.67%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
72.03%
Below 50% of NXPI's 455.67%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
40.58%
Equity/share CAGR of 40.58% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
22.21%
Below 50% of NXPI's 81.94%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
0.82%
Positive short-term equity growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
1263.46%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1263.46% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
181.31%
Dividend/share CAGR of 181.31% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
100.13%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 100.13% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
2.87%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. NXPI's 6.49%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
2.22%
We show growth while NXPI is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.07%
Asset growth well under 50% of NXPI's 15.97%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-0.60%
We have a declining book value while NXPI shows 22.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
5.30%
Debt shrinking faster vs. NXPI's 24.80%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
-5.33%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
7.06%
We expand SG&A while NXPI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.