PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.68%
Negative revenue growth while NXPI stands at 38.48%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-2.25%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-16.28%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-15.24%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-14.95%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-12.50%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-13.75%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.46%
Share reduction while NXPI is at 30.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.88%
Reduced diluted shares while NXPI is at 25.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.31%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-61.75%
Negative OCF growth while NXPI is at 52.77%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-66.59%
Negative FCF growth while NXPI is at 77.01%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
42.07%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 99.50%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
2.81%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 50.57%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
14.67%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 49.71%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
54.64%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 170.84%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
22.90%
Below 50% of NXPI's 2232.84%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
67.10%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 154.10%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
91.38%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 56.71% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
23.77%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
116.01%
Positive short-term CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
37.06%
Equity/share CAGR of 37.06% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
7.25%
Below 50% of NXPI's 624.89%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-1.77%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while NXPI is at 695.96%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
1156.44%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1156.44% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
190.22%
Dividend/share CAGR of 190.22% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
81.56%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 81.56% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
8.93%
AR growth well above NXPI's 0.67%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
6.74%
We show growth while NXPI is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-3.35%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-1.19%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-0.05%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
5.23%
R&D dropping or stable vs. NXPI's 26.73%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
8.89%
We expand SG&A while NXPI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.