205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.81%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x NXPI's 6.34%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
9.81%
Gross profit growth under 50% of NXPI's 84.09%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
15.53%
EBIT growth below 50% of NXPI's 94.48%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
15.39%
Operating income growth under 50% of NXPI's 94.48%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
15.19%
Net income growth under 50% of NXPI's 96.73%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
15.71%
EPS growth under 50% of NXPI's 96.55%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
14.49%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of NXPI's 96.72%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.32%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.20%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.06%
Dividend growth of 0.06% while NXPI is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
95.43%
OCF growth above 1.5x NXPI's 4.83%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
115.37%
FCF growth above 1.5x NXPI's 15.58%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
37.03%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of NXPI's 73.46%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
9.05%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 62.26%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
18.09%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 52.80%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
158.94%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of NXPI's 182.36%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
95.19%
Below 50% of NXPI's 1754.38%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
74.36%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of NXPI's 108.19%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
-46.89%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
40.42%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
36.42%
Positive short-term CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
20.58%
Equity/share CAGR of 20.58% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
5.27%
Below 50% of NXPI's 587.07%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-1.05%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while NXPI is at 649.69%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
1158.01%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1158.01% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
193.41%
Dividend/share CAGR of 193.41% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
35.90%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 35.90% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
6.23%
AR growth well above NXPI's 2.94%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
3.93%
We show growth while NXPI is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
0.04%
Positive asset growth while NXPI is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.17%
BV/share growth above 1.5x NXPI's 1.32%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-12.29%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
5.90%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. NXPI's 3.23%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
2.95%
We expand SG&A while NXPI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.