PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.10%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-6.45%
Negative gross profit growth while NXPI is at 0.42%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
8.36%
Positive EBIT growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-5.45%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
8.16%
Net income growth under 50% of NXPI's 40.66%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
4.00%
EPS growth under 50% of NXPI's 40.74%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
4.08%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of NXPI's 42.31%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.51%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
0.10%
Slight or no buyback while NXPI is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
31.30%
Dividend growth of 31.30% while NXPI is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-1.84%
Negative OCF growth while NXPI is at 2.65%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
0.24%
Positive FCF growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
45.31%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x NXPI's 35.13%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
13.86%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 93.09%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
22.94%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of NXPI's 39.14%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
141.93%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 1960.36%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
62.92%
Below 50% of NXPI's 1697.05%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
26.13%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 73.07%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
131.02%
Similar net income/share CAGR to NXPI's 121.89%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
300.73%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 151.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
123.41%
Positive short-term CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
35.88%
Below 50% of NXPI's 628.72%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
9.07%
Below 50% of NXPI's 578.21%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
5.67%
Below 50% of NXPI's 497.36%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
1168.08%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1168.08% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
194.90%
Dividend/share CAGR of 194.90% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
66.90%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 66.90% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-12.44%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-1.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
1.33%
Positive asset growth while NXPI is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.34%
BV/share growth above 1.5x NXPI's 0.39%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-0.06%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-2.83%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-7.01%
We cut SG&A while NXPI invests at 8.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.