PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.07%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of NXPI's 6.77%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
7.06%
Gross profit growth similar to NXPI's 6.44%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
12.90%
EBIT growth below 50% of NXPI's 1513.87%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
13.14%
Operating income growth under 50% of NXPI's 1513.87%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
11.74%
Net income growth under 50% of NXPI's 3270.37%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
12.59%
EPS growth under 50% of NXPI's 3425.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
12.86%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of NXPI's 3400.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.82%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.80%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.16%
Dividend growth of 0.16% while NXPI is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
15.33%
OCF growth under 50% of NXPI's 548.88%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
10.08%
FCF growth under 50% of NXPI's 824.62%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
69.30%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x NXPI's 51.51%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
48.57%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to NXPI's 51.00%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
30.76%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 15.33%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
169.40%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 3521.96%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
106.95%
Below 50% of NXPI's 576.89%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
57.28%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 452.15%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
275.27%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x NXPI's 190.58%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
182.32%
Below 50% of NXPI's 805.74%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
107.02%
Below 50% of NXPI's 261.93%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
40.20%
Equity/share CAGR of 40.20% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
7.63%
Below 50% of NXPI's 582.37%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
10.99%
Below 50% of NXPI's 758.65%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
518.41%
Dividend/share CAGR of 518.41% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
121.07%
Dividend/share CAGR of 121.07% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
82.03%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 82.03% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
2.19%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. NXPI's 6.96%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
1.24%
We show growth while NXPI is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
0.25%
Positive asset growth while NXPI is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-0.29%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
0.02%
Debt shrinking faster vs. NXPI's 18.96%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
1.56%
We increase R&D while NXPI cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-10.20%
We cut SG&A while NXPI invests at 4.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.