PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-12.77%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-14.16%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-21.48%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-21.73%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-21.08%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-19.88%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-19.62%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-1.65%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.92%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
24.31%
Dividend growth of 24.31% while NXPI is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
1.85%
Positive OCF growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
4.95%
Positive FCF growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
100.57%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 51.97%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
39.89%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of NXPI's 56.48%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
23.68%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of NXPI's 33.56%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
157.89%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 2233.55%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
103.87%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to NXPI's 96.01%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
59.17%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 140.77%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
1456.48%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 153.90% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
176.30%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x NXPI's 142.07%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
57.27%
Positive short-term CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
29.63%
Below 50% of NXPI's 729.36%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-5.16%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while NXPI is at 579.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-4.04%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
601.64%
Dividend/share CAGR of 601.64% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
157.27%
Dividend/share CAGR of 157.27% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
102.33%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while NXPI cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-23.85%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
4.77%
We show growth while NXPI is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-7.73%
Negative asset growth while NXPI invests at 2.25%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-13.04%
We have a declining book value while NXPI shows 8.84%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
0.02%
Debt shrinking faster vs. NXPI's 15.70%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
2.56%
We increase R&D while NXPI cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
4.55%
We expand SG&A while NXPI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.