PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.70%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-0.29%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
4.57%
Positive EBIT growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-1.29%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
17.55%
Positive net income growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
19.84%
Positive EPS growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
19.35%
Positive diluted EPS growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-1.61%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.70%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.54%
Dividend reduction while NXPI stands at 0.72%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
102.12%
Positive OCF growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
130.43%
Positive FCF growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
22.18%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x NXPI's 17.18%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
13.14%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 1.01%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-4.83%
Negative 3Y CAGR while NXPI stands at 0.22%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
303.61%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with NXPI's 295.86%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
136.80%
Positive OCF/share growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
103.54%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 14.01%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
136.66%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 54.21% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
123.84%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
41.81%
Positive short-term CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
3.34%
Below 50% of NXPI's 1973.61%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-15.44%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while NXPI is at 1039.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-22.54%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
638.34%
Dividend/share CAGR of 638.34% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
162.46%
Dividend/share CAGR of 162.46% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
79.33%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 79.33% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-10.64%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
6.64%
Inventory growth well above NXPI's 0.08%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
0.94%
Asset growth well under 50% of NXPI's 7.92%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
0.45%
Positive BV/share change while NXPI is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
3.76%
Debt shrinking faster vs. NXPI's 26.98%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
0.53%
We increase R&D while NXPI cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-3.84%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.