PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
17.85%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of NXPI's 24.77%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
17.82%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of NXPI's 26.74%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
23.29%
EBIT growth below 50% of NXPI's 122.07%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
31.03%
Operating income growth under 50% of NXPI's 122.07%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-1.96%
Negative net income growth while NXPI stands at 89.72%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-2.65%
Negative EPS growth while NXPI is at 89.61%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-2.03%
Negative diluted EPS growth while NXPI is at 89.78%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.11%
Slight or no buybacks while NXPI is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.22%
Diluted share count expanding well above NXPI's 0.12%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
0.13%
Dividend growth under 50% of NXPI's 1.06%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
-16.10%
Negative OCF growth while NXPI is at 27.29%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-18.43%
Negative FCF growth while NXPI is at 39.87%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
31.77%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of NXPI's 61.27%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
23.77%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to NXPI's 25.41%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
-0.08%
Negative 3Y CAGR while NXPI stands at 16.93%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
41.36%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 187.81%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
13.88%
Below 50% of NXPI's 30.51%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-9.71%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while NXPI stands at 0.91%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
103.37%
Positive 10Y CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
88.52%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
13.44%
Positive short-term CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
7.90%
Below 50% of NXPI's 609.83%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-7.15%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while NXPI is at 740.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-18.37%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
644.90%
Dividend/share CAGR of 644.90% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
163.60%
Dividend/share CAGR of 163.60% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
79.57%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 79.57% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
18.37%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. NXPI's 56.96%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-3.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
4.37%
Asset growth above 1.5x NXPI's 0.31%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
8.79%
BV/share growth above 1.5x NXPI's 1.26%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
0.01%
Debt shrinking faster vs. NXPI's 0.03%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
1.85%
R&D dropping or stable vs. NXPI's 8.96%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
1.50%
We expand SG&A while NXPI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.