205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.79%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of NXPI's 10.59%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
7.87%
Gross profit growth under 50% of NXPI's 18.17%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
20.72%
EBIT growth below 50% of NXPI's 1346.88%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
12.68%
Operating income growth under 50% of NXPI's 1346.88%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
24.76%
Net income growth under 50% of NXPI's 1504.55%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
24.49%
EPS growth under 50% of NXPI's 1475.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
24.14%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of NXPI's 1421.47%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.22%
Share reduction more than 1.5x NXPI's 2.01%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.32%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x NXPI's 6.17%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
13.33%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while NXPI cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
47.26%
OCF growth under 50% of NXPI's 95.26%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
47.49%
FCF growth under 50% of NXPI's 104.60%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
47.46%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 171.00%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
40.65%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of NXPI's 45.62%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
16.50%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of NXPI's 24.48%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
120.33%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 531.34%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
63.52%
Below 50% of NXPI's 254.21%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
18.07%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 70.03%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
128.52%
Below 50% of NXPI's 332.96%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
122.19%
Positive 5Y CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
425.94%
Positive short-term CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
12.26%
Below 50% of NXPI's 706.99%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
1.64%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-4.74%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
681.02%
Dividend/share CAGR of 681.02% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
167.12%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while NXPI is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
64.37%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 64.37% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
1.58%
AR growth well above NXPI's 1.32%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-5.65%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
6.28%
Positive asset growth while NXPI is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
10.11%
Positive BV/share change while NXPI is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
4.74%
We have some new debt while NXPI reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
0.52%
R&D dropping or stable vs. NXPI's 5.02%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-2.21%
We cut SG&A while NXPI invests at 8.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.