205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.38%
Revenue growth under 50% of NXPI's 10.21%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
2.44%
Gross profit growth under 50% of NXPI's 11.32%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
1.49%
EBIT growth below 50% of NXPI's 24.08%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
4.16%
Operating income growth under 50% of NXPI's 24.08%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
0.83%
Net income growth under 50% of NXPI's 30.73%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
0.96%
EPS growth under 50% of NXPI's 33.56%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
0.98%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of NXPI's 34.51%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.11%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.47%
OCF growth under 50% of NXPI's 45.28%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
11.93%
FCF growth under 50% of NXPI's 51.22%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
66.03%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 151.44%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
37.03%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of NXPI's 46.00%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
14.40%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 41.59%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
164.44%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 334.74%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
86.38%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x NXPI's 62.15%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
21.04%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
301.53%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 60.63% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
118.16%
Below 50% of NXPI's 618.61%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
30.19%
Positive short-term CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
36.59%
Below 50% of NXPI's 362.56%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
28.13%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
21.31%
Positive short-term equity growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
688.88%
Dividend/share CAGR of 688.88% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
167.47%
Dividend/share CAGR of 167.47% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
64.28%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 64.28% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
3.90%
Our AR growth while NXPI is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
0.38%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. NXPI's 5.11%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
12.96%
Positive asset growth while NXPI is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
8.95%
Positive BV/share change while NXPI is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
23.80%
Debt growth far above NXPI's 0.02%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-0.77%
Our R&D shrinks while NXPI invests at 3.36%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-3.06%
We cut SG&A while NXPI invests at 3.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.