PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.20%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-13.82%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-14.40%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-16.11%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-19.40%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-19.33%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-19.46%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.22%
Slight or no buybacks while NXPI is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.22%
Slight or no buyback while NXPI is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-0.05%
Dividend reduction while NXPI stands at 4.40%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-47.14%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-129.77%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
45.79%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 139.87%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
5.11%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 67.12%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-13.52%
Negative 3Y CAGR while NXPI stands at 31.72%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
161.49%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of NXPI's 198.03%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
-5.20%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while NXPI is at 221.86%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-44.30%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while NXPI stands at 25.75%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
169.54%
Below 50% of NXPI's 455.40%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-6.31%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while NXPI is 3506.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-36.13%
Negative 3Y CAGR while NXPI is 95.81%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
89.97%
Below 50% of NXPI's 724.34%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
105.71%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 1.47%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
69.26%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 15.02%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
332.40%
Dividend/share CAGR of 332.40% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
68.60%
Below 50% of NXPI's 300.26%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
27.51%
Below 50% of NXPI's 168.88%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-6.49%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
2.10%
We show growth while NXPI is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
7.84%
Positive asset growth while NXPI is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
0.29%
Under 50% of NXPI's 2.41%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
20.36%
We have some new debt while NXPI reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
3.91%
We increase R&D while NXPI cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
3.88%
We expand SG&A while NXPI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.