205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.40%
Revenue growth above 1.5x NXPI's 0.03%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
5.54%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x NXPI's 1.79%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-2.20%
Negative EBIT growth while NXPI is at 4.56%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-2.95%
Negative operating income growth while NXPI is at 4.56%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
1.99%
Net income growth at 50-75% of NXPI's 2.97%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
1.65%
EPS growth under 50% of NXPI's 3.61%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
1.67%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of NXPI's 2.83%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
0.22%
Slight or no buybacks while NXPI is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.22%
Slight or no buyback while NXPI is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-0.05%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
54.47%
Positive OCF growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
319.48%
Positive FCF growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
36.34%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 117.62%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
7.05%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 55.27%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-15.54%
Negative 3Y CAGR while NXPI stands at 28.57%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
138.05%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of NXPI's 192.73%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
-10.13%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while NXPI is at 60.67%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-25.04%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while NXPI stands at 26.63%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
93.78%
Below 50% of NXPI's 288.52%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-11.27%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while NXPI is 1666.72%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-40.93%
Negative 3Y CAGR while NXPI is 76.91%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
93.15%
Below 50% of NXPI's 725.18%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
108.41%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 6.46%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
56.21%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 29.34%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
330.83%
Dividend/share CAGR of 330.83% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
68.63%
Below 50% of NXPI's 299.90%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
27.31%
Below 50% of NXPI's 77.61%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
2.39%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. NXPI's 5.22%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
0.56%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. NXPI's 2.19%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
0.47%
Positive asset growth while NXPI is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.14%
Under 50% of NXPI's 2.57%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-2.10%
We’re deleveraging while NXPI stands at 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
4.18%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. NXPI's 5.47%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
2.20%
We expand SG&A while NXPI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.