205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.55%
Positive revenue growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-0.04%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-5.71%
Negative EBIT growth while NXPI is at 7.75%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-3.85%
Negative operating income growth while NXPI is at 7.11%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-2.16%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-2.27%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-1.54%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.22%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.33%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.06%
Dividend growth under 50% of NXPI's 0.59%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
-57.51%
Negative OCF growth while NXPI is at 44.50%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-134.00%
Negative FCF growth while NXPI is at 2.56%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
48.25%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of NXPI's 77.18%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
25.05%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 54.78%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-15.86%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
60.00%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x NXPI's 40.76%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
2.07%
Below 50% of NXPI's 21.76%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-59.84%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
106.27%
Below 50% of NXPI's 519.86%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
2.74%
Below 50% of NXPI's 2674.51%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-45.67%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
81.59%
Below 50% of NXPI's 1778.40%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
117.02%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 13.83%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
18.72%
Below 50% of NXPI's 48.51%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
299.12%
Dividend/share CAGR of 299.12% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
50.60%
Below 50% of NXPI's 171.11%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
18.13%
Below 50% of NXPI's 79.56%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
77.72%
AR growth well above NXPI's 2.71%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
3.53%
We show growth while NXPI is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-4.93%
Negative asset growth while NXPI invests at 3.26%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-2.73%
We have a declining book value while NXPI shows 2.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-5.50%
We’re deleveraging while NXPI stands at 8.02%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
5.30%
We increase R&D while NXPI cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
5.83%
We expand SG&A while NXPI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.