PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.31%
Revenue growth above 1.5x NXPI's 3.21%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
11.33%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x NXPI's 0.13%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
14.74%
Positive EBIT growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
18.05%
Positive operating income growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
9.84%
Positive net income growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
10.85%
Positive EPS growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
10.16%
Positive diluted EPS growth while NXPI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.22%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.44%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.02%
Dividend reduction while NXPI stands at 0.12%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
119.08%
OCF growth above 1.5x NXPI's 37.88%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
302.55%
FCF growth above 1.5x NXPI's 94.26%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
56.74%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of NXPI's 79.10%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
38.54%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of NXPI's 77.31%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-13.53%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
158.33%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 104.58%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
9.09%
Below 50% of NXPI's 107.18%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
6.59%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while NXPI is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
111.90%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 36.73% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-5.33%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while NXPI is 328.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-42.73%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
83.06%
Below 50% of NXPI's 1254.96%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
116.48%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x NXPI's 18.89%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
17.94%
Below 50% of NXPI's 42.98%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
297.32%
Dividend/share CAGR of 297.32% while NXPI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
51.38%
Below 50% of NXPI's 169.49%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
18.05%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 75-90% of NXPI's 20.43%. Bill Ackman wants overhead or revenue enhancements to match competitor's dividend growth.
-36.69%
Firm’s AR is declining while NXPI shows 1.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
2.67%
Inventory growth well above NXPI's 0.47%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
3.48%
Asset growth above 1.5x NXPI's 0.28%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
0.20%
Under 50% of NXPI's 3.20%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
9.30%
We have some new debt while NXPI reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
1.93%
R&D dropping or stable vs. NXPI's 4.75%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
2.75%
We expand SG&A while NXPI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.