205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.84%
Revenue growth above 1.5x ON's 1.59%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
7.84%
Gross profit growth under 50% of ON's 87.85%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
7.84%
EBIT growth below 50% of ON's 138.01%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
7.84%
Operating income growth under 50% of ON's 133.71%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-34.14%
Negative net income growth while ON stands at 135.03%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-33.33%
Negative EPS growth while ON is at 135.65%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-33.33%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ON is at 135.65%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.64%
Slight or no buybacks while ON is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.64%
Slight or no buyback while ON is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
8.00%
Dividend growth of 8.00% while ON is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.81%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 71.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
7.81%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 19.72%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
7.81%
Positive 3Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
291.16%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x ON's 245.86%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
291.16%
Below 50% of ON's 12132.26%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
291.16%
Positive short-term CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.00%
Dividend/share CAGR of 8.00% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
8.00%
Dividend/share CAGR of 8.00% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
8.00%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 8.00% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.