205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.26%
Revenue growth above 1.5x ON's 1.59%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
3.26%
Gross profit growth under 50% of ON's 87.85%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
3.26%
EBIT growth below 50% of ON's 138.01%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
3.26%
Operating income growth under 50% of ON's 133.71%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
13.82%
Net income growth under 50% of ON's 135.03%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.38%
Slight or no buybacks while ON is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.38%
Slight or no buyback while ON is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.18%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 71.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
15.18%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of ON's 19.72%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
15.18%
Positive 3Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
165.52%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of ON's 245.86%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
165.52%
Below 50% of ON's 12132.26%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
165.52%
Positive short-term CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.