205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.65%
Revenue growth above 1.5x ON's 1.59%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
12.33%
Gross profit growth under 50% of ON's 87.85%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
1050.00%
EBIT growth above 1.5x ON's 138.01%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
1050.00%
Operating income growth above 1.5x ON's 133.71%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-15.38%
Negative net income growth while ON stands at 135.03%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.01%
Slight or no buybacks while ON is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.01%
Slight or no buyback while ON is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-0.01%
Dividend reduction while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
69.74%
Positive OCF growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
20.39%
Positive FCF growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
18.60%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 71.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
18.60%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to ON's 19.72%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
10.01%
Positive 3Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.11%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while ON is at 245.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-17.11%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while ON is 12132.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-78.81%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
76.59%
Dividend/share CAGR of 76.59% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
76.59%
Dividend/share CAGR of 76.59% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
63.51%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 63.51% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
6.33%
AR growth well above ON's 12.36%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
3.96%
Inventory growth well above ON's 0.43%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.15%
Positive asset growth while ON is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-0.58%
We have a declining book value while ON shows 0.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
4.84%
Debt growth far above ON's 0.13%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.10%
SG&A growth well above ON's 1.18%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.