PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.70%
Revenue growth above 1.5x ON's 1.59%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
171.79%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x ON's 87.85%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-1233.33%
Negative EBIT growth while ON is at 138.01%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1233.33%
Negative operating income growth while ON is at 133.71%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-700.00%
Negative net income growth while ON stands at 135.03%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-445.24%
Negative EPS growth while ON is at 135.65%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-445.24%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ON is at 135.65%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.04%
Slight or no buybacks while ON is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.04%
Slight or no buyback while ON is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-0.04%
Dividend reduction while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
3256.25%
Positive OCF growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
223.77%
Positive FCF growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
34.49%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 71.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
34.49%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 19.72%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
10.19%
Positive 3Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.93%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while ON is at 245.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-25.93%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while ON is 12132.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-169.92%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
52.64%
Below 50% of ON's 411.86%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
52.64%
Below 50% of ON's 142.72%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
31.37%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of ON's 54.30%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-15.63%
Cut dividends over 10 years while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-15.63%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
56.25%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 56.25% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-19.11%
Firm’s AR is declining while ON shows 12.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-1.00%
Inventory is declining while ON stands at 0.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.45%
Positive asset growth while ON is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-3.32%
We have a declining book value while ON shows 0.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-4.34%
We’re deleveraging while ON stands at 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.16%
SG&A growth well above ON's 1.18%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.