PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.31%
Negative revenue growth while ON stands at 1.59%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-58.24%
Negative gross profit growth while ON is at 87.85%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
250.00%
EBIT growth above 1.5x ON's 138.01%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
250.00%
Operating income growth above 1.5x ON's 133.71%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
147.06%
Net income growth comparable to ON's 135.03%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
148.23%
EPS growth similar to ON's 135.65%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
148.23%
Similar diluted EPS growth to ON's 135.65%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
-29.30%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-29.30%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
53.23%
Dividend growth of 53.23% while ON is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-97.71%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-130.90%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
85.05%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x ON's 71.75%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
69.30%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 19.72%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
41.60%
Positive 3Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
484.92%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 245.86% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-31.93%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while ON is 12132.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-36.89%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
158.20%
Dividend/share CAGR of 158.20% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
139.08%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 139.08% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
0.22%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. ON's 12.36%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
1.84%
Inventory growth well above ON's 0.43%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-6.19%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
37.76%
BV/share growth above 1.5x ON's 0.51%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-11.77%
We’re deleveraging while ON stands at 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.17%
We cut SG&A while ON invests at 1.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.