PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.86%
Revenue growth above 1.5x ON's 1.59%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
0.99%
Gross profit growth under 50% of ON's 87.85%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
3232.57%
EBIT growth above 1.5x ON's 138.01%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
3232.57%
Operating income growth above 1.5x ON's 133.71%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-8.90%
Negative net income growth while ON stands at 135.03%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-2.50%
Negative EPS growth while ON is at 135.65%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-10.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ON is at 135.65%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-18.38%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
16.37%
Slight or no buyback while ON is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-9.44%
Dividend reduction while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
36.22%
Positive OCF growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
88.24%
Positive FCF growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
106.37%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x ON's 71.75%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
57.31%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 19.72%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
53.45%
Positive 3Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.10%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
440.05%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 245.86% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
56.48%
Below 50% of ON's 12132.26%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
370.04%
Positive short-term CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
70.39%
Below 50% of ON's 411.86%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
50.67%
Below 50% of ON's 142.72%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
11.63%
Below 50% of ON's 54.30%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-29.09%
Cut dividends over 10 years while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
31.31%
Dividend/share CAGR of 31.31% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-15.96%
Negative near-term dividend growth while ON invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
3.13%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. ON's 12.36%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-7.95%
Inventory is declining while ON stands at 0.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.04%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
23.65%
BV/share growth above 1.5x ON's 0.51%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-1.95%
We’re deleveraging while ON stands at 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.65%
SG&A growth well above ON's 1.18%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.