PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.20%
Revenue growth above 1.5x ON's 1.59%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
-6.44%
Negative gross profit growth while ON is at 87.85%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-6.41%
Negative EBIT growth while ON is at 138.01%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-6.41%
Negative operating income growth while ON is at 133.71%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
0.69%
Net income growth under 50% of ON's 135.03%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
-5.26%
Negative EPS growth while ON is at 135.65%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-5.26%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ON is at 135.65%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.57%
Slight or no buybacks while ON is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-0.27%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
2.54%
Dividend growth of 2.54% while ON is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
4.31%
Positive OCF growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-94.07%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
137.93%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 71.75%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
76.91%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 19.72%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
71.38%
Positive 3Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.01%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while ON is at 17.99%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
42.84%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
665.18%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 245.86% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
548.82%
Below 50% of ON's 12132.26%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
257.19%
Positive short-term CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
128.96%
Below 50% of ON's 411.86%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
49.99%
Below 50% of ON's 142.72%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
98.79%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 54.30%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
4.56%
Dividend/share CAGR of 4.56% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
23.92%
Dividend/share CAGR of 23.92% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
29.96%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 29.96% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-5.71%
Firm’s AR is declining while ON shows 12.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
6.77%
Inventory growth well above ON's 0.43%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
6.61%
Positive asset growth while ON is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
5.79%
BV/share growth above 1.5x ON's 0.51%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-6.21%
We’re deleveraging while ON stands at 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-100.00%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
40.00%
SG&A growth well above ON's 1.18%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.