PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.33%
Revenue growth under 50% of ON's 1.59%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-1.92%
Negative gross profit growth while ON is at 87.85%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-542.50%
Negative EBIT growth while ON is at 138.01%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-231.58%
Negative operating income growth while ON is at 133.71%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-293.42%
Negative net income growth while ON stands at 135.03%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-274.42%
Negative EPS growth while ON is at 135.65%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-274.42%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ON is at 135.65%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.10%
Slight or no buybacks while ON is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-2.51%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
2.32%
Dividend growth of 2.32% while ON is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-7.27%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-52.53%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
53.71%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of ON's 71.75%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
11.08%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of ON's 19.72%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
3.47%
Positive 3Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12095.78%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 17.99%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-44.04%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-937.41%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while ON is at 245.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-1.99%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while ON is 12132.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-193.53%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.55%
Below 50% of ON's 142.72%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
66.64%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x ON's 54.30%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
108.73%
Dividend/share CAGR of 108.73% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
-69.20%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
33.29%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 33.29% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
10.02%
AR growth well above ON's 12.36%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-13.16%
Inventory is declining while ON stands at 0.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
3.42%
Positive asset growth while ON is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-3.93%
We have a declining book value while ON shows 0.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
44.26%
Debt growth far above ON's 0.13%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
90.64%
We increase R&D while ON cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-2.24%
We cut SG&A while ON invests at 1.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.