PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.31%
Negative revenue growth while ON stands at 1.59%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
2.08%
Gross profit growth under 50% of ON's 87.85%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
24.74%
EBIT growth below 50% of ON's 138.01%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
24.74%
Operating income growth under 50% of ON's 133.71%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
587.55%
Net income growth above 1.5x ON's 135.03%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
558.82%
EPS growth above 1.5x ON's 135.65%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
568.75%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x ON's 135.65%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.89%
Slight or no buybacks while ON is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.76%
Slight or no buyback while ON is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-3.88%
Dividend reduction while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-9.44%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-26.97%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
41.78%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of ON's 71.75%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
2.59%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 19.72%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-7.06%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.89%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 17.99%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
31.84%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
2355.49%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 245.86% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
2232.04%
Below 50% of ON's 12132.26%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
780.74%
Positive short-term CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
146.09%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with ON's 142.72%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
111.23%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 54.30%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
84.04%
Dividend/share CAGR of 84.04% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
8.03%
Dividend/share CAGR of 8.03% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
39.18%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 39.18% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-0.17%
Firm’s AR is declining while ON shows 12.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
2.85%
Inventory growth well above ON's 0.43%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
28.62%
Positive asset growth while ON is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
40.37%
BV/share growth above 1.5x ON's 0.51%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-5.41%
We’re deleveraging while ON stands at 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-1.79%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-11.65%
We cut SG&A while ON invests at 1.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.