PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.88%
Negative revenue growth while ON stands at 1.59%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-3.46%
Negative gross profit growth while ON is at 87.85%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-155.87%
Negative EBIT growth while ON is at 138.01%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-155.87%
Negative operating income growth while ON is at 133.71%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-116.65%
Negative net income growth while ON stands at 135.03%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-116.07%
Negative EPS growth while ON is at 135.65%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-116.82%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ON is at 135.65%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.87%
Slight or no buybacks while ON is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-0.32%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
5.33%
Dividend growth of 5.33% while ON is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-13.35%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-23.08%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
27.65%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 71.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
12.23%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of ON's 19.72%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
-17.00%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.67%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x ON's 17.99%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
4.59%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-398.64%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while ON is at 245.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-439.94%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while ON is 12132.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-244.17%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
176.53%
Below 50% of ON's 411.86%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
178.97%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x ON's 142.72%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
85.07%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 54.30%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
93.86%
Dividend/share CAGR of 93.86% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
30.11%
Dividend/share CAGR of 30.11% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
40.58%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 40.58% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-3.45%
Firm’s AR is declining while ON shows 12.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-2.11%
Inventory is declining while ON stands at 0.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-10.15%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-7.23%
We have a declining book value while ON shows 0.51%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-16.54%
We’re deleveraging while ON stands at 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
169.45%
We increase R&D while ON cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
16.62%
SG&A growth well above ON's 1.18%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.