PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
17.46%
Revenue growth above 1.5x ON's 1.59%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
25.99%
Gross profit growth under 50% of ON's 87.85%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
51.31%
EBIT growth below 50% of ON's 138.01%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
54.85%
Operating income growth under 50% of ON's 133.71%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
29.41%
Net income growth under 50% of ON's 135.03%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
31.25%
EPS growth under 50% of ON's 135.65%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of ON's 135.65%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.26%
Slight or no buybacks while ON is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.57%
Slight or no buyback while ON is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
2.76%
Dividend growth of 2.76% while ON is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
42.40%
Positive OCF growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
260.00%
Positive FCF growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
18.29%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 71.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-12.42%
Negative 5Y CAGR while ON stands at 19.72%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-5.56%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.54%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while ON is at 17.99%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
77.15%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
150.39%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of ON's 245.86%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
64.61%
Below 50% of ON's 12132.26%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
310.75%
Positive short-term CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
130.52%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with ON's 142.72%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
48.58%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of ON's 54.30%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
88.55%
Dividend/share CAGR of 88.55% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
83.56%
Dividend/share CAGR of 83.56% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-0.18%
Negative near-term dividend growth while ON invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
18.90%
AR growth well above ON's 12.36%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
7.49%
Inventory growth well above ON's 0.43%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-0.61%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.37%
50-75% of ON's 0.51%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-2.08%
We’re deleveraging while ON stands at 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
17.36%
We increase R&D while ON cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
4.02%
SG&A growth well above ON's 1.18%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.