PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.42%
Negative revenue growth while ON stands at 1.59%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-0.96%
Negative gross profit growth while ON is at 87.85%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-0.65%
Negative EBIT growth while ON is at 138.01%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-2.38%
Negative operating income growth while ON is at 133.71%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
21.82%
Net income growth under 50% of ON's 135.03%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
14.29%
EPS growth under 50% of ON's 135.65%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
15.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of ON's 135.65%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
4.86%
Slight or no buybacks while ON is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
5.55%
Slight or no buyback while ON is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-7.44%
Dividend reduction while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
71.52%
Positive OCF growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
221.43%
Positive FCF growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
2.56%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 71.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-18.47%
Negative 5Y CAGR while ON stands at 19.72%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-10.52%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.47%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to ON's 17.99%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
212.82%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
309.18%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x ON's 245.86%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
90.17%
Below 50% of ON's 12132.26%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
346.95%
Positive short-term CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
112.72%
Below 50% of ON's 411.86%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
143.50%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with ON's 142.72%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
73.87%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x ON's 54.30%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
74.53%
Dividend/share CAGR of 74.53% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
31.98%
Dividend/share CAGR of 31.98% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-9.70%
Negative near-term dividend growth while ON invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
16.07%
AR growth well above ON's 12.36%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
9.29%
Inventory growth well above ON's 0.43%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
19.47%
Positive asset growth while ON is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
12.42%
BV/share growth above 1.5x ON's 0.51%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
16.35%
Debt growth far above ON's 0.13%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-4.11%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
10.71%
SG&A growth well above ON's 1.18%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.