PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-19.42%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-49.76%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-230.13%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-230.13%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-185.65%
Negative net income growth while ON stands at 4.52%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-184.62%
Negative EPS growth while ON is at 4.35%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-184.62%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ON is at 4.35%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
1.23%
Share count expansion well above ON's 0.41%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.23%
Diluted share count expanding well above ON's 0.41%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-1.21%
Dividend reduction while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
392.44%
OCF growth above 1.5x ON's 111.68%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
131.24%
FCF growth above 1.5x ON's 79.83%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-15.41%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-28.11%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-17.91%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
1951.34%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
200.68%
Positive OCF/share growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
65.62%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
12.15%
Positive 10Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-319.46%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-430.85%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
352.70%
Positive growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
150.63%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
85.64%
Positive short-term equity growth while ON is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-79.28%
Cut dividends over 10 years while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-2.78%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-2.08%
Negative near-term dividend growth while ON invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-14.48%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-8.31%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-3.13%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-3.76%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-2.28%
We’re deleveraging while ON stands at 10.05%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-7.62%
Our R&D shrinks while ON invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
14.94%
We expand SG&A while ON cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.