PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.23%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-17.32%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
17.79%
EBIT growth below 50% of ON's 70.16%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
17.79%
Operating income growth under 50% of ON's 70.16%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
40.61%
Net income growth at 50-75% of ON's 54.66%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
36.36%
EPS growth at 50-75% of ON's 54.55%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
36.36%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of ON's 54.55%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
-6.67%
Share reduction while ON is at 0.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-6.67%
Reduced diluted shares while ON is at 0.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
7.15%
Dividend growth of 7.15% while ON is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-43.00%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-90.98%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-22.52%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-30.24%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-18.27%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
23879.66%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
98.23%
Positive OCF/share growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-44.59%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
26.28%
Positive 10Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
27.72%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-166.64%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
283.66%
Positive growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
154.84%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
78.94%
Positive short-term equity growth while ON is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-68.64%
Cut dividends over 10 years while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
1.81%
Dividend/share CAGR of 1.81% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
1.65%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 1.65% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-13.03%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-16.82%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-8.73%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-2.32%
We have a declining book value while ON shows 87.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
1.53%
Debt growth far above ON's 0.43%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-13.11%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-22.00%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.