PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.35%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-2.35%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-9.39%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-9.39%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
0.85%
Positive net income growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
-3.57%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-3.57%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-4.27%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-4.27%
Reduced diluted shares while ON is at 0.33%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
1.64%
Dividend growth of 1.64% while ON is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
133.53%
OCF growth above 1.5x ON's 79.42%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
2372.73%
FCF growth above 1.5x ON's 56.35%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-12.84%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
44.05%
5Y CAGR of 44.05% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
27.18%
3Y CAGR of 27.18% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
90.99%
OCF/share CAGR of 90.99% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
16.19%
OCF/share CAGR of 16.19% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
160.94%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 160.94% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
-16.62%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while ON is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-293.74%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while ON is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-187.06%
Negative 3Y CAGR while ON is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
419.26%
Equity/share CAGR of 419.26% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
175.56%
Equity/share CAGR of 175.56% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
158.15%
Equity/share CAGR of 158.15% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
28.19%
Dividend/share CAGR of 28.19% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
6.92%
Dividend/share CAGR of 6.92% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
54.74%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 54.74% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-17.32%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-16.56%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
3.51%
Positive asset growth while ON is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
7.46%
Positive BV/share change while ON is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-1.19%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
6.70%
We increase R&D while ON cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-3.53%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.