PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.98%
Positive revenue growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-2.45%
Negative gross profit growth while ON is at 2.63%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-29.68%
Negative EBIT growth while ON is at 64.41%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-29.68%
Negative operating income growth while ON is at 64.41%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
97.89%
Net income growth above 1.5x ON's 35.53%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
120.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x ON's 33.33%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
120.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x ON's 33.33%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-10.05%
Share reduction while ON is at 0.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-10.05%
Reduced diluted shares while ON is at 0.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-7.61%
Dividend reduction while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
45.99%
Positive OCF growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
40.95%
Positive FCF growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-16.58%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-18.69%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-7.31%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
28.80%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-6.59%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
4.84%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
131.58%
Positive 10Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-90.07%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-54.01%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
290.57%
Positive growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
58.71%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
37.68%
Positive short-term equity growth while ON is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
10.87%
Dividend/share CAGR of 10.87% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
2.63%
Dividend/share CAGR of 2.63% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
8.23%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 8.23% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-2.08%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
0.37%
Inventory growth well above ON's 0.25%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-0.60%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
8.39%
Positive BV/share change while ON is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
0.24%
Debt growth far above ON's 0.21%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
2.72%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. ON's 4.32%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
4.75%
We expand SG&A while ON cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.