PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.14%
Revenue growth above 1.5x ON's 0.30%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
12.09%
Positive gross profit growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
128.36%
EBIT growth below 50% of ON's 425.71%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
128.36%
Operating income growth under 50% of ON's 425.71%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
119.86%
Net income growth above 1.5x ON's 22.73%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
119.44%
EPS growth above 1.5x ON's 26.09%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
119.44%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x ON's 26.09%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
2.54%
Share count expansion well above ON's 0.34%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
2.54%
Diluted share count expanding well above ON's 0.34%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
0.23%
Dividend growth of 0.23% while ON is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-73.66%
Negative OCF growth while ON is at 57.53%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-87.40%
Negative FCF growth while ON is at 14.58%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
1.63%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-6.45%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-22.48%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
64.62%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
506.54%
Positive OCF/share growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-52.39%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
26.17%
Positive 10Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
892.78%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-72.86%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
363.72%
Positive growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
67.55%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-6.45%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
46.91%
Dividend/share CAGR of 46.91% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
4.65%
Dividend/share CAGR of 4.65% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
3.23%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 3.23% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
12.16%
AR growth well above ON's 6.33%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
11.65%
Inventory growth well above ON's 4.19%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-1.93%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-2.52%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-20.32%
We’re deleveraging while ON stands at 1.01%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-0.97%
Our R&D shrinks while ON invests at 1.14%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
4.51%
We expand SG&A while ON cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.