PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.99%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of ON's 10.62%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
10.72%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of ON's 21.24%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
8.22%
EBIT growth below 50% of ON's 574.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
8.22%
Operating income growth under 50% of ON's 574.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-28.46%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-4.55%
Negative EPS growth while ON is at 12.50%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.13%
Share reduction while ON is at 27.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-34.35%
Reduced diluted shares while ON is at 27.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
53.69%
Dividend growth of 53.69% while ON is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-63.17%
Negative OCF growth while ON is at 17.99%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-101.01%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
0.94%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
32.83%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
18.57%
Positive 3Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-19.88%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
67.07%
Positive OCF/share growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
237.16%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 130.68%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
130.60%
Positive 10Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
32.77%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
62.90%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of ON's 77.52%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
309.80%
Positive growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
66.92%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-5.11%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
83.26%
Dividend/share CAGR of 83.26% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
3.43%
Dividend/share CAGR of 3.43% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
2.09%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 2.09% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
15.64%
AR growth well above ON's 12.71%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
16.67%
Inventory growth well above ON's 7.11%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
1.77%
Asset growth well under 50% of ON's 4.48%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
52.33%
1.25-1.5x ON's 44.75%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-0.36%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
10.27%
We increase R&D while ON cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
14.94%
SG&A declining or stable vs. ON's 78.00%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.