205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.28%
Positive revenue growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
0.54%
Positive gross profit growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
10.98%
Positive EBIT growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
10.98%
Positive operating income growth while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
27.66%
Net income growth under 50% of ON's 494.29%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
32.00%
EPS growth under 50% of ON's 389.86%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
28.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of ON's 389.86%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-1.93%
Share reduction while ON is at 0.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.28%
Reduced diluted shares while ON is at 12.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.79%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
86.17%
Positive OCF growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
308.00%
Positive FCF growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
7.93%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
32.39%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
69.82%
Positive 3Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
102.84%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
72.68%
Positive OCF/share growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
172.49%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x ON's 138.12%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
158.75%
Positive 10Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
36.06%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
564.91%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 113.72%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
285.05%
Positive growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
58.13%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
7.89%
Positive short-term equity growth while ON is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
39.88%
Dividend/share CAGR of 39.88% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
5.99%
Dividend/share CAGR of 5.99% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-6.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while ON invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
1.81%
Our AR growth while ON is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
5.53%
Inventory growth well above ON's 3.85%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
0.54%
Positive asset growth while ON is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
5.72%
BV/share growth above 1.5x ON's 3.65%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-51.52%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-6.03%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-6.93%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.