PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.98%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-10.41%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-26.33%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-26.33%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-12.97%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-12.12%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-12.50%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.35%
Share reduction while ON is at 0.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.65%
Dividend growth of 22.65% while ON is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
38.54%
Positive OCF growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
78.76%
Positive FCF growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-2.53%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
16.81%
5Y CAGR of 16.81% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
63.75%
Positive 3Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
160.39%
OCF/share CAGR of 160.39% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
34.06%
OCF/share CAGR of 34.06% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
55.27%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
124.14%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 124.14% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
7.41%
Net income/share CAGR of 7.41% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
492.03%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 87.10%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
269.66%
Equity/share CAGR of 269.66% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
41.08%
Equity/share CAGR of 41.08% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
2.06%
Below 50% of ON's 13.10%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
64.52%
Dividend/share CAGR of 64.52% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
29.35%
Dividend/share CAGR of 29.35% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
13.43%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 13.43% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-13.69%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-7.37%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
1.00%
Positive asset growth while ON is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.65%
Positive BV/share change while ON is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-1.04%
We’re deleveraging while ON stands at 1.07%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
1.04%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. ON's 0.44%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
3.72%
We expand SG&A while ON cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.