PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.74%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
0.15%
Positive gross profit growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-20.25%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
2.69%
Positive operating income growth while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-16.12%
Negative net income growth while ON stands at 117.07%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-17.24%
Negative EPS growth while ON is at 111.76%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-14.29%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ON is at 112.12%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-1.33%
Share reduction while ON is at 0.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.36%
Reduced diluted shares while ON is at 10.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.95%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-59.92%
Negative OCF growth while ON is at 146.53%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-77.51%
Negative FCF growth while ON is at 128.78%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-9.32%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
3.28%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
81.70%
Positive 3Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
96.01%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
24.83%
Positive OCF/share growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
97.36%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 201.70%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
56.05%
Positive 10Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-6.33%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
1308.11%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 120.29%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
217.61%
Positive growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
1.99%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
12.23%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of ON's 22.56%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
63.26%
Dividend/share CAGR of 63.26% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
17.88%
Dividend/share CAGR of 17.88% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
29.81%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 29.81% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.88%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-7.69%
Negative asset growth while ON invests at 0.20%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-7.64%
We have a declining book value while ON shows 3.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-1.58%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
1.43%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. ON's 0.43%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-4.97%
We cut SG&A while ON invests at 12.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.