PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.06%
Revenue growth under 50% of ON's 8.99%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-2.03%
Negative gross profit growth while ON is at 14.99%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
6.44%
EBIT growth below 50% of ON's 34.60%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
6.44%
Operating income growth under 50% of ON's 34.60%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
3.80%
Net income growth under 50% of ON's 86.38%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
5.13%
EPS growth under 50% of ON's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
5.26%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of ON's 133.33%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-1.23%
Share reduction while ON is at 21.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.50%
Reduced diluted shares while ON is at 7.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
194294.01%
Dividend growth of 194294.01% while ON is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-40.03%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-47.18%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-5.84%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while ON stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
28.37%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
70.09%
Positive 3Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
61.20%
OCF/share CAGR of 61.20% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
49.82%
Positive OCF/share growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
24.02%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of ON's 256.83%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
112.59%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 112.59% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
11.83%
Below 50% of ON's 37.14%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
213.01%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x ON's 162.36%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
175.31%
Equity/share CAGR of 175.31% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
2.48%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
13.01%
Below 50% of ON's 74.43%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
37.38%
Dividend/share CAGR of 37.38% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
40.20%
Dividend/share CAGR of 40.20% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
35.49%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 35.49% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-13.94%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
9.93%
We show growth while ON is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
0.53%
Positive asset growth while ON is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.79%
Under 50% of ON's 50.33%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
84.64%
We have some new debt while ON reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-5.12%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
4.17%
SG&A growth well above ON's 5.82%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.