PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.73%
Revenue growth under 50% of ON's 12.15%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
1.31%
Gross profit growth under 50% of ON's 4.70%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-2.41%
Negative EBIT growth while ON is at 9.29%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-2.41%
Negative operating income growth while ON is at 9.29%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-70.59%
Negative net income growth while ON stands at 13.78%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-69.48%
Negative EPS growth while ON is at 14.29%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-69.33%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ON is at 21.05%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-3.03%
Share reduction while ON is at 0.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-3.09%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.93%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while ON cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-34.43%
Negative OCF growth while ON is at 10.22%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-46.04%
Negative FCF growth while ON is at 215.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
57.48%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
125.75%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
69.50%
Positive 3Y CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
176.00%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while ON is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
39.23%
Below 50% of ON's 187.42%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-6.21%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ON stands at 4020.56%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
581.29%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 35.74% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
765.91%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ON's 159.69%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
79.28%
Below 50% of ON's 360.31%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
194.56%
Positive growth while ON is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
15.59%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while ON is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
20.14%
Below 50% of ON's 98.14%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
40.48%
Dividend/share CAGR of 40.48% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
37.98%
Dividend/share CAGR of 37.98% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
41.93%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 41.93% while ON is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
8.29%
Our AR growth while ON is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
11.69%
Inventory growth well above ON's 5.48%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-7.18%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-3.02%
We have a declining book value while ON shows 98.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.34%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. ON's 2.78%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
3.35%
SG&A growth well above ON's 5.23%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.